Framework of the Study
[Introduction]


[Statement of the Problem] and [Objectives]

[Scope and Limitation]


[Framework of the Study]


[Methods of Data-Gathering]
and [Respondents]


[Recommendations/ Conclusion]

[The Researcher] and [Bibliography]


[Home]

To be able to come up with reliable recommendations, the researchers organized the data gathered into a table of PROs and CONs. The PROs are the advantages that the Youth Ministry experienced in the implementing of the website and the CONs are the problems that they experienced in the implementation of the website.

One advantage was information dissemination. During the summer, there were a lot of activities and not all the youth members were present during the meetings and gatherings to hear the announcements being made. With the website, they could just go to the internet and see the schedule of activities for the summer. Information was made accessible to anyone who had internet access.

The problems or CONs outnumber the advantages. Feedback may be an advantage, but in this case, it is a CON because the use of the website was not able to gather a lot of feedback. There were very few who signed the guestbook and emailed the youth ministry.

Another problem that was encountered was that of promotion. In BFHCF, there are four (4) services (masses) being held. Not all the youth attend in just one service. Some attend the Tagalog services, others the English services, etc. Thus, promotion was not very easy.

Third problem that they experienced was the problem of updating and managing the site. The webmaster of the site is still a student. During the summer, updating the site was easily done. But, since classes have begun, the both the webmaster and the youth leader has their schoolwork to attend to and thus, the site was not taken care of. Therefore, the information in the site are now out of date and obsolete.

These are all affirmed by the survey that was conducted among 25% of the youth group. The results are as follows: Out of thirty (30) respondents, only sixteen (16) knew that there was a website. Among the thirty (30) respondents also, only 20 has access to the internet; thirteen (13) of those were part of the 16 who knew about the website. The remaining three (3) who knew about the website are part of the ten (10) who had no internet access. In addition also, the survey asked if the respondents deemed the website necessary for the youth group. The results are not surprising at all. Nineteen (19) of the thirty (30) respondents believed that the Youth Ministry did not really need the website in its operations.